Searching for Blame in a Boy’s DKA Death

From Utah comes a tragic story of Kaden Jones, a 13-year-old who died unexpectedly from diabetic complications the morning after his first day at basketball camp in July 2014. The story has received brief coverage in the Salt Lake Tribune, regional television news, and the local paper in the young man’s hometown of St. George.
There has been a wrongful death suit filed by the young man’s parents alleging negligence on the part of the basketball camp. Lawyers for the camp have countered that the young man and his parents bear responsibility for his death. Meanwhile, many readers of these news stories have decided to weigh in with their judgement despite not knowing what actually happened; some of the online comments have been brutal, especially towards a family that, for whatever reason, lost a child just a year ago.
In Utah, death certificates are protected against public disclosure for fifty years. Pleadings in civil cases carry something of a presumption of veracity, and in some jurisdictions, have to be supported by affidavit under oath. Even then, complaints are nothing more than allegations of fact, and answers come in the straightforward form of admissions or denials of facts. There really is no way to know who, if anyone, is ultimately to blame for this loss.
All we really know, or can surmise from the initial filings is this:
The young man had Type 1 diabetes and was under proper professional care. He had parents who understood his daily needs and submitted a medical release, general liability release, and medical history forms, as well as additional information on his medical condition to camp officials.
He and a buddy arrived at summer basketball camp at Westminster College, a private college in Utah, where he’d wanted to go for some time. The college fields varsity teams in basketball and seven other sports. It operates summer day and overnight youth camps at various ability levels in basketball and three other sports.
The young man began feeling nauseous shortly after getting to camp, sat out much of the day, skipped meals, may have skipped his insulin, and died the next morning of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA).
What we know about DKA is that as it worsens, it does so rapidly, and the sufferer loses cognitive function –- the ability to understand what is happening. Often emergency hospital care with an insulin IV and electrolytes is needed to stabilize the system. What we do know about adolescents with diabetes is that “the competing distractions of young adult life often interfere with the requirements of successful diabetes management, including the need to maintain consistent medical care”, according to a 2011 ADA position paper on diabetes and teens. We also know that outside the circle of people with diabetes and their caregivers, Type 1 is a misunderstood illness, and there can be a lot of wrong decisions made by those not in the know when confronted by an episode of glycemic imbalance.
That’s it; that’s what we know. It will be up to the parties involved in the case or a jury to sort out the causes of this boy’s death and attribute fault. The only lesson we can take away right now is that there will always be the need for constant vigilance for the most vulnerable who are afflicted by Type 1. That, and that no parent should feel guilty for wanting to follow up “one more time” on their child’s well being at summer camp.
Thanks for reading this Insulin Nation article. Want more Type 1 news? Subscribe here.
Have Type 2 diabetes or know someone who does? Try Type 2 Nation, our sister publication.
Our hearts go out to the family. We lost our 36 year old son a year and a half ago tor DKA and he didn’t have to die. This story sounds similar in that he didn’t have to die but as the article says……Type 1 is not understood. Education is a PRIORITY in this country.
I cried when I first read of his passing and the ensuing lawsuit. You are right. We don’t know the circumstances. What I know personally is that my efforts to politely advocate for my daughter’s safety, a base level of understanding, and any modicum of support from her volleyball club ended in disaster. The club dismissed her for my ‘continued violation of the code of conduct’. The club where I spent the last 2 years volunteering countless hours, where my daughter felt like a normal teen until her last 2 months there. The club where avoiding liability became more important than protecting a young girl’s livelihood. And yet, they’re not bad people. As parents, we loved them for the lessons they helped guide our children through, the opportunities she enjoyed as a competitive athlete. They most certainly became misguided, and acted (failed to act) out of fear, ultimately placing my daughter’s life in danger, and subsequently breaking her heart. It’s important to realize, in this sue happy day and age, the barriers to advocacy that families face. Protecting our kids is sometimes impossible at best.